PM has told the President that Profit Bill is fine. I do not know what was President's reaction to this but I say that this bill is not fine. It is an unethical decision and how an unethical decision can be fine.
It is a decision taken by those who were affected by the existing law. They were violating the law of the land and when confronted with this grave violation they misused the power and changed the law. THIS MAKES IT UNEHICAL.
The law has been made effective with retrospective effect therby legalizing all criminal violations. THIS MAKES IT UNETHICAL.
Parliament and its members (who have forgetten that they are peoples' representatives) are seen as role models by the people. Such unethical behaviour of their representatives has embarassed the people.
I feel ashamed of the MP elected from my constituency.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Under article 143 of the constitution (I think I am quoting the correct article), the president has two options -
1) he can refer it to the constitutional bench
2) the president can hold the bill without signing. Constitution has not framed any time frame for the president to sign the bill.
I pray that President should use these options. Under no circumstances he should sign the bill.
Yes, under no circumstances he should sign this anti-people, anti-constitution bill.
Post a Comment